In: Categories » Electronics and communication » Protocols » Standardized Protocols for Private Instant Messaging
| Although momentum is building for a standardized protocol for instant messaging, interoperability among IM applications continues to be vexed by unresolved business and security issues. Recently, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)-sponsored protocol that would be a key to interoperability was criticized for being insecure by IM software vendors such as AOL Time Warner Inc. and IBM’s Lotus Software. The Lotus-AOL test used a variation of Simple Implementation Protocol (SIP) known as SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions (SIMPLE). It is one of three protocols being considered by the IETF as its Instant Messaging and Presence Protocol, or IMPP. SIMPLE is considered the front-runner over Presence and Instant Messaging Protocol and the Application Exchange protocol because AOL and Microsoft Corp., two of the biggest players in the IM space, already have SIP infrastructure in place for other products. But that doesn’t guarantee the protocol’s success. SIMPLE has a number of problems. It doesn’t deal with group messaging at all; it’s strictly one-to-one. It has a lot of problems with the firewall. But, it does seem to be the major contender. Furthermore, interoperable IM will require universal security among the different IM clients. But the different players don’t want to use someone else’s technology. It’s the not-invented-here problem. If you didn’t do it; you don’t want to use somebody else’s technology. The issue is really more a political one than a technical one. Security is an issue as well for institutions such as the U.S. Army, which uses Bantu Inc.’s Bantu IM and Presence Platform. IM has proved popular among soldiers stationed overseas who use it to communicate with their loved ones back home, most of whom are using consumer IM clients such as AOL’s AIM, Microsoft’s MSN Messenger, and Yahoo Inc.’s Messenger. The Army has decided to live with the security hole created in the interest of preserving troops’ morale. It would be really nice if you could give 128-bit SSL encryption to every IM client out there. Bantu’s done that; it’s similar to what Lotus has done with Sametime. But, with MSN and these others, it’s like the Wild, Wild West. Maybe it doesn’t matter to teenagers, but from the business perspective, it’s an issue. The IMUnified industry group (comprising MSN, Yahoo!, AT&T WorldNet, Odigo Inc., and Openwave Systems Inc.) recently created a protocol for client-to-server IM interoperability that would allow IM clients to interoperate, provided the user had accounts with both clients. The standard was never adopted because of business and legal issues, such as IP rights and service-level agreements. Finally, although vendors and technologists dream of a world where IM is every bit as ubiquitous as e-mail today, many users don’t rank interoperability among IM clients at the top of their priority lists.
|
legal disclaimer
1) Our website is not responsible for the information contained by this article as well for any and all copyright infringements by authors and writers. E-articles is a free information resource. If you suspect this article for any copyright infringements, please read the Terms of service and contact us to investigate the problem.
2) The E-articles directory team is not responsible for inaccuracies, falsehoods, or any other types of misinformation this tutorial may contain and will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by a user through the user's reliance on the information gained here. Please read the Terms of service
Useful tools and features
If you like this article (tutorial), please link to it from your web page using the information above. Linking to this page, this is the only way to help us improve our service, the same time providing your visitors with a way to improve their online experience.
related articles
The Wireless Internet is not just wireless communications across town or the country. It is also local—sometimes in a home or office building. Wireless LANs are just becoming popular with economically priced wireless Ethernet equipment. Standards such as IEEE 802.11, HiperLAN2, and Home RF are leading the way to untethered communications in-building or outside over small areas. Another important development is the Personal Area Network, also known as Bluetooth. Let’s take a look at each of th...
2. The Domain Concept
The solution to all of these problems is the network domain. In a domain, you only have a single name and password, which gets you into every shared PC and printer on the network. Everyone's account information resides on a central computer called a domain controllera computer so important, it's usually locked away in a closet or a data-center room. A domain controller keeps track of who is allowed to log on, who is logged on, and what each person is allowed to do on the network. When you log onto the domain with your PC,...
3. Duplexing Techniques in Wireless communication systems
Wireless communication systems have evolved through several stages of multiple-access control. The foremost controllable resource has always been the frequency spectrum. Other resources such as time, code, and space were initially manipulated in a very precarious and, therefore, ineffective manner. The early systems operated in the simplex mode in the forward link. Halfduplex systems soon appeared, in which forward link and reverse link shared the same channel. Access control was performed on a push-to-talk basis wit...
4. Wireless Networks (WiFi or 802.11)
Millions of people, have embraced the flexibility of a networking system that involves no wires at alla cordless networking technology called WiFi or 802.11 ("eight-oh-two dot eleven"). (Your Macintosh friends probably call the same thing AirPort, because that's what Apple calls it.) To get onto a wireless network, your PC needs a WiFi transmitter. Almost every laptop sold today has WiFi built in. You can also add it to a desktop in the form of a wireless card or USB adapter; either way, you gain a little antenna. Once...
5. VPN and Tunneling Protocols
Let us discuss the most common and widely used real-world VPN protocols. The growing number of users, the ease of accessibility, and the reduced cost of the Internet connection have introduced a greater need for cost-effective and secure communications without purchase of leased lines. Many companies participated in the development that resulted in the creation of different VPN standards and protocols. We discuss the most common ones here. IPSec IPSec is the most widely acknowledged, supported, and standardize...
6. MOBILE ELECTRONIC MAIL
Electronic mail (email) is the transferring of information messages via an electronic communications system. Initial versions of email could send short text messages of 1 to 3 pages. Email technology has evolved (standardized) to allow file attachments, and new versions of email (such as those using Flash technology) send animation or video clips as email messages. Email messaging is probably the best single reason for users to get connected to the Internet. There were over 400 million email account u...
7. RADIUS Related Tools
The following list includes a few alternative RADIUS servers as well as several utilities for administration and user monitoring of the RADIUS daemon: Cistron. This server has become widely used in the free software community and was written by Miquel van Smoorenburg (miquels@cistron.nl) from the original Livingston source. The home page (http://www.radius.cistron.nl/) contains more information. ...