In: Categories » Business » Ethics and presentation » Risk Management Plan
|
Purpose The risk management plan lays down the groundwork for how risk management will be carried out in a project. It serves as guidance for the risk process, its thresholds, and its formats, defining the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders in risk management. It is notable that the risk management plan is not a listing of specific risks and is not used to establish the particular strategies for risks, once they are identified. Application The risk management plan is shared with project stakeholders to clarify their roles and responsibilities in the risk management process and to identify when specific potential risks are truly of concern to the organization. It also outlines the risk budgeting process, detailing how and when risk contingency funds may be allocated and applied. Content The risk management plan consists of basic information about how risk management will be conducted during the project. It does not address specific behaviors associated with specific risks, but instead forms a framework for the rest of the risk management process. 1.0 Risk Process Risk process may be as simple as two steps (e.g., assessment and response) or as complex as six or seven steps (e.g., planning, identification, qualification, quantification, response development, and response control [3]). The process steps should include clarification on how each of the processes will be carried out and the level of depth of information to be provided for each. 2.0 Risk Responsibilities Just as the buyer and seller in project environments have different responsibilities for deliverables, so do they have different responsibilities for risks. Those responsibilities should be outlined here. Responsibilities may include information on who will identify risks, as well as who should evaluate them and develop strategies for those that are of the greatest significance. 3.0 Risk Thresholds Thresholds represent personal and organizational tolerance for risk. They are the definitions of tolerance in terms of budget, schedule, requirements, and other sensitive cultural issues (e.g., politics, media exposure). They are normally expressed as ceilings beyond which the project should not proceed, or as notification points for upper echelons of management. 4.0 Risk Finances This element of the risk management plan may address both funds set aside for risks within the project (contingency reserve) and funds set aside within managemen control for risks outside the project’s purview (management reserve). In both cases, this component of the plan details how and when the project team may draw down funds from those reserve accounts. Risk finances may also provide detail on how the amounts for the reserve accounts will be established. 5.0 Risk Evaluation Because evaluation protocols vary from project to project, the risk management plan should include some detail on how risks will be scored and termed. Particularly for risk qualification, there should be some definition of terms for both the probability of a risk’s occurrence and for the impact should it come to pass. Many projects employ the high-medium—low (H-M-L) scheme for both impact and probability. 6.0 Process Timing High-risk projects may require frequent risk reevaluation. Projects with lower risk may not require such frequency. The risk management plan should include detail on the frequency of risk identification, assessment, and response development, as well as the appropriate application of any tracking processes or documentation. Approaches For each of the components of the risk management plan, the approaches may be widely varied. The key is to ensure some measure of consistency from project to project within an organization. One example is provided here: 1.0 Risk Process Risks shall be identified during an initial brainstorming session engaging all available team members. (Risks shall be identified using full sentences to clarify the nature of the negative effect they may have on the project and/or the organization.) They shall be evaluated using the H-M-L scheme defined herein by the project manager and/or his or her designee. Those risks achieving a score of M-H or greater shall be posted on the team watch list, and strategies will be determined for each. Strategies will become tasks embedded in the team activity list and will be assigned to individual team members. They will be tracked as activities in the project management software in a risk table and will be updated to reflect current status. The process shall be updated at least once every 2 months. 2.0 Risk Responsibilities The project manager shall serve as the risk coordinator. Martin L. will serve as the team’s risk archivist both in updating the project management software and in providing risk reports to management on an as-needed basis. Team members shall be responsible for their assigned risk activity. John C. will document minutes from all risk meetings and be responsible for disseminating them within 3 days of the meetings’ conclusion. 3.0 Risk Thresholds Any individual risks that (if they come to pass) will exceed these thresholds should be escalated to the project manager’s attention immediately for further dispensation. Budget: $20,000; Schedule: any impact to critical path tasks; Requirements: any requirement impact that would ultimately be visible to the customer or change the nature of the deliverable; Politics: any risk that could prompt a client phone call to executive management by a customer or end user. 4.0 Risk Finances Risk contingency for this project is established at 8% of the total project budget. These funds may be allocated by completing Form 517W, identifying the specific nature of and rationale for the allocation. Completed forms should be submitted to Nancy A. in Accounting. 5.0 Risk Evaluation For this project, the following evaluation criteria apply: Probability High—Happens frequently. Few projects don’t have this occur. Impact High—Cost: More than $10,000. Schedule: Affects a critical path task. Requirements: Visible to the customer or changes nature of the deliverable. Medium—Cost: $1,000-$10,000. Schedule: Affects any task with less than 3 days of total float. Requirements: Visible internally, no change to the nature of the deliverable. Low—Cost: Less than $1,000. Schedule: Affects tasks with 3 days of total float or more. Requirements: Invisible to all save the original developer. All medium-high (probability-impact) items will be evaluated for risk strategies and added to the tracking list. 6.0 Process Timing The process shall be conducted at least once every other month. Considerations Because risk management plans are designed to encourage some measure of consistency in risk management practice, they can often be recycled or reused from project to project. If that’s done, the key is to ensure that the risk thresholds are appropriate for the current project and that the responsibility assignments are updated to reflect the members of the current project team.
|
legal disclaimer
1) Our website is not responsible for the information contained by this article as well for any and all copyright infringements by authors and writers. E-articles is a free information resource. If you suspect this article for any copyright infringements, please read the Terms of service and contact us to investigate the problem.
2) The E-articles directory team is not responsible for inaccuracies, falsehoods, or any other types of misinformation this tutorial may contain and will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by a user through the user's reliance on the information gained here. Please read the Terms of service
Useful tools and features
If you like this article (tutorial), please link to it from your web page using the information above. Linking to this page, this is the only way to help us improve our service, the same time providing your visitors with a way to improve their online experience.
related articles
E-business has many definitions, but it is essentially "the use of networks and information technology to electronically design, market, buy, sell and deliver products and services worldwide". E-business is in its "infancy" and that it is currently taking its first steps which are "tentative" and "unsure". This is perhaps a little dated in some respects because the e-business rate of change would suggest that it is growing up quickly, albeit with ethics trailing behind somewhat. There is still a...
2. Different Kinds of Productivity
We must distinguish between different kinds of productivity. Economic theory refers to macroproductivity on national and global levels, microproductivity on business and institutional levels, and nanoproductivity on suborganizational levels such as the department or the productivity of an individual job or person. We also distinguish between performance (or material) productivity and economic (or financial) productivity. Both performance productivity and e...
3. The Role of Knowledge Workers
The function of personal knowledge, understanding, and judgments in achieving effective organizational performance is becoming clearer. Early on, managerial emphasis on work procedures and methods was placed on observable work. Later, it included the role of information and information flows, which are also observable. Now, focus is shifting to include knowledge. It has always been understood that know-how and expertise influence quality of work. However, the knowledge focus has tended to be centered on the in...
4. Organizational Mission Statements
Mission statements are also vital to successful organizations. One of the most important thrusts of my work with organizations is to assist them in developing effective mission statements. And to be effective, that statement has to come from within the bowels of the organization. Everyone should participate in a meaningful way -- not just the top strategy planners, but everyone. Once again, the involvement process is as important as the written product and is the key to its use. I am always intrigued whenever I g...
When you are going before customers, executives, or team members, how you present can be almost as important as what you say. Some executives speaking to groups come across as unfocused when they are supposed to be inspiring. They may be capable leaders in other respects, but their stature is diminished when they present their ideas. There are many executives who do inspire people with their presentations. They do it in their own style, but they come across as sincere, thoughtful, and prepared. Here are several tips for ...
6. The Code of Meeting Ethics
Almost everyone agrees that too much time is wasted in meetings. It doesn’t have to be that way; that time can easily be cut in half. As a sales professional, if you are running the meeting, take advantage of the code of meeting ethics. If you are a meeting participant, suggest to the meeting facilitator that you persuade the group to agree to follow this code. Put it on display. People who have adopted just the time-allotted agenda and the timekeeper ideas are enthusiastic about the results in time sav...
7. Ethics of Educating Your Customers
If customers don’t understand a product, they won’t buy it. Customers become educated through experience. Make it your goal to educate your customers so they can better understand the products or services you offer. Of course, when they are more educated they become more sophisticated and are more likely to know better what they want or don’t want, what it will take to get it, and how much it should cost. They are also more likely to negotiate when they are educated, but this can become a selling advantage if yo...
8. Telltale Signs of Dishonest Brokers
Dishonest brokers often ask their victims a steady stream of questions designed to derail honest investors from asking the right questions. In contrast, honest brokers encourage you to ask questions, provide you with additional educa tional materials, and make certain that you understand the risks involved in your investment decision. And if you decide not to spend your money, they’re untroubled by your investment decision. The National Futures Association has collected 16 questions that are turn-offs for dishone...