In: Categories » Computers and technology » Microsoft OS family » MS DOS Alternatives
|
IBM and several other PC manufacturers all sold customized versions of Microsoft's MS-DOS, and that there was a competitor called DR-DOS. Gary Kildall, whom we left several pages ago spurning IBM's offer to create the operating system for the PC, went on to finish his 16-bit operating system, called CP/M-86. Kildall sued IBM and Microsoft for copying CP/M, and eventually reached a settlement whereby IBM agreed to offer CP/M-86 in addition to PC-DOS. And IBM did offer CP/M-86, for $240 a copy, versus $40 for PC-DOS. It didn't sell well. By 1987, Kildall had abandoned the idea of promoting CP/M in the 16-bit world. Killdall's company Digital Research eventually produced an MS-DOS clone called DR-DOS, which never, as they say, made the big bucks, but did force Microsoft to significantly lower its prices and make enhancements to MS-DOS that otherwise might never have been made. Anyone who's used edit to edit a text file has Digital Research to thank. Digital Research also produced GEM, a graphical operating system that predated and competed with Windowsmore on that shortly. DR-DOS ultimately did not survive, although various legal battles continued. In 2000, Microsoft paid Digital Research's successor company a reputed $150$200 million to settle suits over the licensing and marketing practices that drove DR-DOS under. Besides DR-DOS, other operating systems came and went, or came and stayed, including these more popular ones:
Other operating systems were developed, including a multiuser dBASE-like system that I remember seeing once, but they've faded to total obscurity.
|
legal disclaimer
1) Our website is not responsible for the information contained by this article as well for any and all copyright infringements by authors and writers. E-articles is a free information resource. If you suspect this article for any copyright infringements, please read the Terms of service and contact us to investigate the problem.
2) The E-articles directory team is not responsible for inaccuracies, falsehoods, or any other types of misinformation this tutorial may contain and will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by a user through the user's reliance on the information gained here. Please read the Terms of service
Useful tools and features
related articles
Although most Windows applications place fairly low demands on the display system, putting up fairly static displays and updating them relatively infrequently, interactive games and video displays are very graphics intensive. Game players pay big bucks for fps, or frames per second, which is a measure of how fast the hardware and software can generate new images as the scene changes and objects move. Under about 30fps, the image flickers and motion is noticeably jerky. Beyond 30fps, faster updates aren't noticeable, and the e...
2. Using Simple File Sharing in Windows
Although most home users are typically happy letting anyone at any computer read or modify any file, business users need to restrict access to files with payroll, personnel, and proprietary information. Windows XP and its predecessors, Windows NT and Windows 2000, were primarily designed for business use, so they require usernames and passwords for identification, and have a security system that lets computer owners restrict access to sensitive files on a user-by-user and file-by-file basis on each computer. Unfortunate...
3. The Evolution of Microsoft Windows ~ The Windows 9x Family
By the mid-1990s, processor power had increased and memory prices had decreased dramatically since Windows' original release. The Internet had also sprung onto the world stage, from an academic tool to an instrument of global communication and commerce. (You may recall that Windows 3.1 did not even include support for the TCP/IP network protocol used on the Internetyou had to purchase it from a third-party vendor.) Users' expectations likewise had grown with computers' capabilities, and desktop publishing, graphics editing, and...
4. How to install Windows and Installation Types
Deciding on the type of installation to perform is dictated by many factors, such as the following: Is there an operating system currently installed? If so, do you want to preserve settings and configurations, or start from scratch? Will the installation be performed interactively or remotely? How many computers are to be installed at a single time? Is your network arranged in a domain model using Active Directory? These are ...
If you find the items on the screen difficult to read or see, you can either lower the screen resolution, which makes everything larger but blurrier, or ask Windows to make the elements themselves larger while keeping a crisper, high screen resolution. There are two ways you can do this. Here's the first procedure: 1. Right-click the Desktop and select Properties. 2. Save the current screen settings so if you're unhappy with the results, you can back the changes out. Select the Themes tab, click Save As, and enter ...
6. DOS Versions
Let's take a look at the actual nuts and bolts that constituted each version of DOS. DOS 1.x PC DOS 1.0 was introduced along with the IBM PC on August 12, 1981, and supported only single-sided 5.25-inch drives. Floppy disks were formatted using 8 sectors per track (one side, 40 tracks) resulting in a capacity of only 160KB when formatted. There was no support for hard disks at all, which were generally quite rare for personal computers at the time. DOS was a text-based operating system, hence there was no graphi...
7. How to Back Up and Restore the Windows Registry
Before diving into Registry modifications, I'll talk about backing them up. Every computer book I've seen stresses these facts: 1. There is no Undo key in the Registry Editor. 2. Improper changes to the Registry can keep Windows from booting, or can make subsystems fail to work....
8. How to Configure Multiple Monitors under Windows
Windows quite nicely supports the use of two or more monitors; Windows can stretch your desktop across up to 16 of them. Sixteen may be overkill, but even two 15" monitors, with about the same area as one 21" monitor, make it easier to stretch out several application windows. And you should see what three 21" monitors in a row look like! To get a multiple monitor setup, you'll need to install multiple display adapters, use a display adapter that supports more than one monitor (a "dual head" or "quad head...










