Getting the Most Out of Workshops

written by: Emanuell Sterbinszki; article published: year 2007, month 06;



In: Categories » Business » Branding and certification » Getting the Most Out of Workshops

There are four levels by which workshops are evaluated:

  • Level 1 — Did participants enjoy the experience?
  • Level 2 — Did participants learn?
  • Level 3 — Did participants use the skills?
  • Level 4 — Did participants' performance improve?

Clearly, Levels 1 and 2 happen in the workshop and contribute to Levels 3 and 4. If Levels 3 and 4 are not reached, the training is largely a waste of time and money. Here are some ideas to avoid such waste.

  1. Evaluate whether you really need to go to a workshop at all. Can you get the information you need from:

    • a colleague?

    • a book (self-help)?

    • an Internet search?

    • your manager?

    • self-paced computer-based training?

  2. If the skill is best acquired in a workshop format, find out if this is available internally or externally. The advantages of an in-house workshop include:

    • Learning the same skill as others in a similar situation. This will give a critical mass of people a better chance of using new techniques. No one person will feel like an oddball trying new things on his own.

    • Having the ability to network and share successes and problems with others who are easily accessible.

    • Less time-wasting. The workshop will probably be tailored so participants can deal with real issues.

    • Case studies will be confined to organizational issues.

    • The program may be just in time and scheduled right before you need to put the new skills into practice.

  3. The advantages of an outside workshop include:

    • The ability to stand back and see the big picture. The workshop cannot deal with the nitty-gritty issues you face. Rather, it would take more of a global approach.

    • Networking opportunities. Sometimes we believe our organization to be unique. By meeting people from a variety of organizations, we often find that we have similar issues. And more important, we may discover new innovative solutions that have application in our organization.

  4. During a workshop, be it internal or off-site, you will improve your learning if you:

    • Let the instructor know if you have specific issues you would like to have addressed.

    • Familiarize yourself with the course objectives. Highlight the ones of greatest importance to you. Focus on them.

    • Write down key ideas constantly. Develop a summary daily.

    • Ask lots of questions. If you feel that some of your questions are off track or of little interest to others, corner the trainer at breaks or at the end of the day, to ensure that you get answers.

    • Participate with enthusiasm.

    • Practise skills at every opportunity. Participate in role-playing rather than acting as observer.

    • Sit closer to the front to ensure fewer distractions.

    • Ask for feedback from the instructor and fellow participants on how you are doing, particularly when you're involved in a role play. Pay close attention to what you are told, without being defensive.

    • Stretch yourself. The workshop is an opportunity to try things that you've never done before. Failure and mistakes can be an effective part of the learning process.

    • Ask for feedback on your effectiveness. Listen without being defensive. Make notes on how you can improve.

    • Find someone you trust so you can mentor and support each other after the workshop.

    • Offer to give your boss or peers a summary of what you gained at the workshop. This will present you with the great challenge of getting your head around the key concepts.

  5. Before you attend a workshop, consider these issues:

    • What is your preferred learning style? Do you, for example, prefer to listen and observe rather than do things experientially? What process will predominate at the workshop? Some, particularly the one-day-wonder seminars, appeal to the observers but have little value for the hands-on learner.

    • Who is providing the workshop? What are his or her credentials? What is his or her training style? Does it match your learning style?

    • How effective was the workshop for others?

legal disclaimer

1) Our website is not responsible for the information contained by this article as well for any and all copyright infringements by authors and writers. E-articles is a free information resource. If you suspect this article for any copyright infringements, please read the Terms of service and contact us to investigate the problem.
2) The E-articles directory team is not responsible for inaccuracies, falsehoods, or any other types of misinformation this tutorial may contain and will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by a user through the user's reliance on the information gained here. Please read the Terms of service

Useful tools and features

Translate this article to...    Send this article to you or to a friend

Link to this article from your page   
If you like this article (tutorial), please link to it from your web page using the information above. Linking to this page, this is the only way to help us improve our service, the same time providing your visitors with a way to improve their online experience.

related articles

1. DCID 6.3
DCID 6/3 is the certification and accreditation process used by federal agencies working on intelligence projects (e.g., the CIA). Specifically, information technology projects that require that anyone working on them has a Top Secret, Sensitive Compartmentalized Information (SCI) clearance use the DCID 6/3 process. DCID stands for Director of Central Intelligence Directive and 6/3 refers to the process described in section 6, part 3 of the compendious Director of Central Intelligence Directives.5 The certification ...

2. Creditation and Acreditation Handbook Development
In developing the program, you’ll need to write a C&A Handbook that instructs your agency or bureau on how to prepare a Certification Package. The idea is to standardize the development of all Certification Packages that are submitted for evaluation.Without a handbook and a specified process, the Certification Packages will have a different look and feel. If 50 different Certification Packages all have the right information in it, but in different formats, it is going to be very difficult for the...

3. Criteria to Use for Determining the Certification and Accreditation Levels
In order to determine the level at which your information should be certified and accredited, there are seven criteria you should take into consideration: ■   Confidentiality ■   Integrity ■   Availability ■   Interconnection State ■   Processing State ■   Complexity State ■   Mission Criticality I am going to show you how to assign risk and impact ...

4. What Is Certification and Accreditation
Certification and Accreditation is a process that ensures that systems and major applications adhere to formal and established security requirements that are well documented and authorized. Informally known as C&A, Certification and Accreditation is required by the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) of 2002. All systems and applications that reside on U.S. government networks must go through a formal C&A before being put into production, and every three years thereafter. Since accredit...

5. The NIACAP Process
As you recall, the NIACAP C&A model was developed by the CNSS, and its intent is to be used as guidance for the C&A of national security systems. National Security Systems are systems that contain National Security Information (NSI). Classified NSI includes information determined to be either “Top Secret,”“Secret,” or “Confidential” under Executive order 12958,4 which was released by the White House office of the Press Secretary in April 1995. However, NSI may also inc...

6. NIACAP and NIST Phases Differences and Similarities
The NIST process was designed for unclassified information, more commonly known as Sensitive But Unclassified (SBU) information. The framework for the NIST C&A methodology is described in a publication known as NIST Special Publication 800-37, Guide for the Security Certification and Accreditation of Federal Information Systems. A copy of it is available online at http://csrc.nist. gov/publications/nistpubs/800-37/SP800-37-final.pdf. Both NIST and NIACAP establish a framework to provide ac...

7. DITSCAP Phases
DITSCAP was developed for evaluating and accrediting Department of Defense systems and also includes four phases. DITSCAP was developed and is published by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) and it applies to the acquisition, operation, and on-going support of any Department of Defense system that collects, stores, transmits, or processes unclassified or classified information. It is mandatory for use by all defense agencies. The DITSCAP guidance is described in a document known as DoDI 5200.40...

8. Recognizing the Need for Certification
All general support systems and major applications are required by FISMA and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to be fully certified and accredited before they are put into production. Production systems and major applications are required to be reaccredited every three years. Going forward we will refer to systems that require C&A (e.g., general support systems and major applications) simply as information systems. One of the primary objectives of C&A is to force the authorizing official to und...