Applying Your Intellectual Capital

written by: Alan Gilmore; article published: year 2007, month 06;



In: Categories » Business » Business development » Applying Your Intellectual Capital

Gains for sharing come about as the result of applications of one or more of three forms of capital:

  1. Intellectual capital in the form of the expertise required to initiate and manage a profit-improvement project

  2. Financial capital in the form of investment

  3. Operating capital in the form of products, services, and systems

Applying intellectual capital to create profit-improvement projects, not simply stocking them with operating capital, is becoming increasingly recognized by suppliers as what their business is all about. But ideas in themselves are worth little, being nothing more than raw materials that rank at the bottom of the value curve. By adding values from application and implementation, information and education, and consultation and evaluation of results, intellectual capital can realize whatever opportunity it may have for capitalization.

The gain in gainsharing is net present value (NPV). It is calculated as the present value of a wealth creation project plus the worth of all future values when they are discounted back to the present. This takes into account the reduced value of money over time. In addition to NPV as the key indicator of gain, payback is a measure of the exposure to risk in realizing the NPV. The longer the payback, the greater the risk. A third indicator is the relationship of reward to risk that is calculated by the ROI.

Penetrating Your Customers' Value Chains

In order to share in the gains you contribute on a PIP-by-PIP basis, you must find a customer problem or opportunity that lets you realize three results:

  1. The maximum gains from a product, service, or system application can be contributed.

  2. They can be accumulated in the least time.

  3. They can be accumulated at the highest level of cost-effectiveness.

As a consultative seller, you must seek out customers who can gain the most from your PIPs so that there is maximum gain for both of you to share. Customers who can gain the most are called "gain-sensitive." A customer can be gain-sensitive no matter where the business may be on an industry's value-creation curve:

  • Customers who are ahead of the industry curve can be gain-sensitive because they want to stay ahead.

  • Customers who are behind the curve must be gain-sensitive because they want to move up before they drop off.

  • Customers who are in between are gain-sensitive because they must move up to become one of the top three competitors or face up to two business-altering options: consolidate by acquiring or being acquired, or vacate their market.

Fitting In as a Value-Adding Partner

If you want to gainshare instead of price—in Consultative Selling language, "propose an investment"—you must be able to answer the customer's question, "Where do you fit as a partner in the gains of my business?" In order to answer, you must know where you can add value. Since you are not offering yourself as a partner in the entirety of a customer manager's operation, your positioning is crucial in helping determine if there is a partnerable vacancy that you can fill.

  • Suppliers who position themselves as moneymakers are fitting themselves primarily into a customer's sales, marketing, and distribution operations. They may also fit into the parts of a customer's product development, market research, manufacturing, or inventory control operations that affect sales. Moneymakers can range up and down value chains, intervening in operations where they are capability-specific for improving contributions of revenue.

  • Suppliers who position themselves as moneysavers are fitting themselves differently into customer support and supply operations. Instead of acting as sales builders or market builders, they add value by reducing an operation's contribution of costs.

Of the two platforms for gainsharing—one to expand revenues and the other to reduce costs—the proposed gains from cost reduction are easier to calculate and propose than revenue improvements. Customers accept potential cost savings more readily than a prospect of newly generated revenues. Costs, being internal, can be better controlled. Markets, the sources of revenues, are more ephemeral since they are outside customer control and defy prediction. Besides, customers are almost always better at control than at expansion. Yet revenue improvements are almost always significantly greater contributions to gain for sharing

legal disclaimer

1) Our website is not responsible for the information contained by this article as well for any and all copyright infringements by authors and writers. E-articles is a free information resource. If you suspect this article for any copyright infringements, please read the Terms of service and contact us to investigate the problem.
2) The E-articles directory team is not responsible for inaccuracies, falsehoods, or any other types of misinformation this tutorial may contain and will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by a user through the user's reliance on the information gained here. Please read the Terms of service

Useful tools and features

Translate this article to...    Send this article to you or to a friend

Link to this article from your page   
If you like this article (tutorial), please link to it from your web page using the information above. Linking to this page, this is the only way to help us improve our service, the same time providing your visitors with a way to improve their online experience.

related articles

1. Key Elements for Strategy Innovation
Strategy innovation can be done in a company on a one-time, ad hoc basis.  However, there is growing interest in the development of an internal capability for strategy innovation. Whether it is done on an ad hoc or ongoing basis, strategy innovation in any corporation must consist of the following four elements: 1. Management mandate 2. Corporate infrastructure 3. Innovation process 4. Corporate culture Management Mandate It is ...

2. Which Companies Benefit from Strategy Innovation
A strategy innovation process may not be right for every company. However, it is difficult to cite what type of company would not benefit from understanding their customers better, gaining valuable foresight about their emerging marketplace, and considering how changes in their business model could provide a competitive advantage. If your company fulfills these requirements, you can benefit from a strategy innovation initiative or an ongoing strategy innovation process. Listed below are those types of...

3. The Five Phases of the Strategy Innovation Process
The strategy innovation process is a method for creating a portfolio of innovative, new business opportunities that could become the basis for a new strategic direction for your corporation. Corporate teams that have taken these journeys liken themselves to reconnaissance teams, sent by their companies to explore the strategic frontiers of their industries. The Strategic Innovation Process is a series of phases, not a linear series of steps By carrying out the phases, your company will avoid some of the proce...

4. Flexibility of the Discovery Process and Strategic Innovation
The purpose of a strategy innovation initiative that is right for your company will typically depend on the following factors: Size of company Size of industry Type of industry Strategic frontier Degree of innovation desired Size of Company In general, larger companies have more resources available for strategy innovation than smaller companies. Yet the process of identifying new business opportunities is equally important, if not ...

5. Business Strategy Innovation and Product Innovation
It is interesting to note how many companies in recent years have adopted ‘‘innovation’’ as a core value or as part of their mission statements. If we as a society have moved from the Information Age to the Knowledge Age, then this relatively new emphasis on innovation is quite logical. When information is ubiquitous and is no longer a source of competitive advantage, it is the innovative use of that information (via knowledge) that differentiates people, companies, and nations. Innovation ...

6. Risks Involved in the Discovery Process and the Strategy Innovation
There is very little at risk with a strategy innovation initiative, other than the time and money invested by the team. The internal team sets the overall budget so that costs (primarily in the Exploring Phase) can be controlled to whatever level represents a reasonable investment in the company’s future. We have never encountered an initiative where discussions with customers and industry experts did not lead to valuable insights for the company. The only question is whether the impact of those insi...

7. Strategy Innovation as a Source of Corporate Renewal
Strategy innovation is often considered the calling card of startup companies looking to enter already-existing markets. However, established companies also use strategy innovation to their advantage, if they have the instinct for it. We recognize this instinct as a strong, internal emphasis on corporate ‘‘renewal.’’ The instinct for renewal is something beyond a cultural norm; it seems to be embedded in the organization’s DNA, what it sees when it looks in the mirror. These companies...

8. The Corporate Dilemma of the Current Business vs. the Future Business
It is not easy for the senior management team of an existing company to navigate the white water conditions of a dynamic marketplace. Everything seems to be constantly changing—products, technologies, competitors, customer needs, distribution channels, and so on. How should the company respond? Is it better to take action or wait for the market to settle down? Should the company stick with their current strategy or move to a new one? On the one hand, the company must manage its current business, whic...

9. Developing Applications with the User in Mind
The corporate scenario described in this article is an example of a common problem in the development of management support systems: in both systems design and implementation, too little attention is given to the needs and perspectives of the end user. Inadequate attention to ease of use in system design and lack of appropriate training and conversion preparedness affect applications aimed at salespeople, production people, administrators, middle managers, and senio r management. These shortcomings can be observed in companies across ...